Board and executive committees

Our activities are governed by a Board of Trustees and appointed to represent the professional engineering community, comprising industry representatives, employers and academics. 

In accordance with our Regulations, the Board has established a series of committees and panels to oversee particular aspects of governance and regulatory activity.

Board of Trustees

John Chudley Cut Out Gradient Bkgrnd 380 X200

Prof John Chudley

BSc PhD CEng FIMarEST

Chair

Alastair Revell

EUR ING Alastair Revell

CEng CITP FBCS FRSA FIAP

Photo of Andrew Rowe

Andrew Rowe

CEng FCIBSE MSLL 
Registration Standards Committee

Photo of Anthony Gibson

Anthony Gibson

CEng MNucI MIET MAPM MINCOSE

David Short

David Short

CEng FRAeS FIET

Emer Murnaghan

Emer Murnaghan OBE

CEng MICE CEnv MIW FIEI

Photo of Estelle Clark

Estelle Clark

CQP FCQI FRSA

Photo of James Baker

James Baker

CEng FIET
Finance, Audit & Remuneration Panel

Photo of Jim Shields

Jim Shields

CEng CSci FIMMM CGeol FGS FICE FIQ

Photo of Jo Parker

Jo Parker MBE

CEng FICE FIWater FCIWEM

Photo of Margaret Graham

Margaret Graham

CEng Hon FIET

Photo of Martin Penn

Martin Penn

CEng FRAeS
International Advisory Panel

Photo of Mike McLoughlin

Mike McLoughlin

CEng FIMechE FIET
Privy Council and Governance Panel

Photo of Phil Nelson

Phil Nelson

CEng FIStructE
Quality Assurance Committee

Photo of Rob Best

Dr Rob Best

CEng FIChemE

Photo of Steve Burnage

Prof Steve Burnage

CEng CEnv FIMechE FSOE IMAAEES

Executive Committees

RSC has oversight of matters to do with the education, training and professional development of professional engineers and technicians.  It is responsible for the standard of competence and commitment, and the underpinning knowledge and understanding requirements for professional registration.  

This includes publishing the Registration Code of Practice that aligns with the requirements set out in the UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence (UK-SPEC), the ICTTech Standard and the Accreditation of HE Programmes manual .  

All these standards and requirements are kept under review by RSC, and recommendations for change are made to the Board.  

RSC comprises nominees from professional engineering institutions, including academics and those from industry, which enables the building and sharing of knowledge and good practice, and ensures that the Engineering Council is kept abreast of issues relating to the education and professional development of professional engineers and technicians.

QAC is responsible for licensing professional engineering institutions where they are considered competent to assess candidates for professional registration, and evaluate academic courses and professional development programmes for accreditation, against UK-SPEC.

This involves monitoring the performance of engineering institutions, reviewing and making appropriate changes to QAC policies and processes, and encouraging information exchange between institutions, whilst maintaining an overview of licence related issues. QAC also approves suitable bodies as Professional Affiliates. QAC is comprised of volunteer members nominated by the licensed institutions who are registrants of suitable standing and experience.  Efforts are made to maintain a balance of institutions on QAC in proportion to their number of registrants.

IAP is responsible for advising on matters that have an impact on the global recognition of Engineering Council standards and the international mobility of engineering professionals. This involves advising on the international promotion of the national register, updating the Board on relevant international developments, guiding the Engineering Council’s international activity and identifying suitable representatives of the UK engineering profession to join international committees.

IAP acts as the National Monitoring Committee for FEANI registration purposes and as the responsible Committee for the UK section of International Registers.  IAP also promotes the flow of communications between the Engineering Council and the institutions on international matters. IAP comprises nominees from professional engineering institutions, including academics and those from industry, with international experience and expert knowledge of mobility issues affecting professional engineers and technicians.

PCGP is responsible for the regular review of the Charter, Bye-Laws and Regulations of the Engineering Council, and making proposals for change to the Board. The Panel also advises the Board on responses made to requests for advice from the Privy Council Office and other government departments on matters concerning the constitution of relevant Institutions and responds to requests from professional engineering institutions for advice on constitution, governance and disciplinary procedures.

This work also involves publishing and reviewing guidance on disciplinary procedures and consulting with licensed members on significant proposed changes to policies or procedures. PCGP also considers representations from professional engineering institutions, registrants or members of the public concerning the conduct of institutions or registrants and determine whether, and if so how, appeal proceedings should take place.  PCGP comprises suitable nominees from the Board, together with advisors to assist in this work of the Panel.

FARP has responsibility for keeping the financial management of the Engineering Council under review. Through the delegated authority of the Board it approves variations to expenditure and investment policy within established limits.

The Panel advises the Board and CEO on financial services; monthly management accounts; remuneration; staff pensions; subscription and fees policies; the annual budget, report and accounts; risk assessment policy; audit reports; delegated financial authorities; and the business continuity plan.

The Group B and C Panel is an advisory panel of the Engineering Council Board providing a forum for the exchange of information and good practice with respect to membership and registration matters and to discuss pan-engineering issues of joint concern and where appropriate provide focus for campaigns or lobbying and the dissemination of a collective view.

The Panel also provides a platform for organisations and individuals to present topics of common interest, including identifying and implementing opportunities for co-operation between institutions for mutual benefit and the public good.